Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Jones Expressway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Jones Expressway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:USRD/NT. Detcin (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. —Arxiloxos (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —Arxiloxos (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - This appears somewhat notable as it is a controlled-access road, yet it also appears like another city street. Dough 48 72 22:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep referenced and has at least one interesting feature in its name. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The only reference is a Google Map. Detcin (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep plenty of references available by clicking the "news" button up above here. Admr Boltz 23:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of the references available by clicking the "news" button are about I-465 or I-70, not Sam Jones. The few article about Sam Jones are dead links.Detcin (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.